Betting licenses: MGA, Curaçao, Anjouan, Kahnawake and more

Comparison of popular licenses
License | Benefits | Features & Cons |
---|---|---|
MGA (Malta) | High level of trust, access to EU payments | Expensive, strict requirements, lengthy process |
Curaçao | Fast issuance, low taxes, inexpensive registration | Restrictions on working with some banks and PSPs |
Anjouan (Comoros) | New alternative with minimal bureaucracy | Not all payments are accepted without additional checks yet |
Kahnawake (Canada) | Recognized in a number of regions, focus on safety | Limited recognition in Europe |
Antigua & Barbuda | Regulator with history, stability | Longer registration process |
What is included in the license
Allowing betting and gambling
Data Security Commitment and KYC/AML
Reporting on financial flows, players, bonuses
Ability to work with PSP, banks, cryptocurrencies
Support for responsible play and anti-fraud policy
License selection factors
Launch Budget ($5,000 to $100,000 +)
Target market geography (EU, Asia, Latin America)
Payment infrastructure requirements
Level of control and readiness for audit
Time of receipt (2 weeks to 6 months)
Technical and legal aspects
Registration of a legal entity in the selected jurisdiction
Prepare privacy policy, user agreement
Licensor Integration and Reporting
Player protection support: limits, self-locking, dispute resolution
Ability to scale to multiple domains/brands under the same license (in Curaçao and Anjouan)
Benefit to operator
Legal work without the risk of blocking
Ability to attract investment and partners
Opening corporate bank accounts
Integration with payment and encryption providers
Increased trust from players
Choosing a license is a strategic decision for the betting business. Each jurisdiction gives its own balance between launch speed, cost and level of legal protection. Companies that bet on transparency and legal purity from the start benefit in the long run.
Contact Us
Fill out the form below and we’ll get back to you soon.