Risks and automatic restriction of forks

Why arbitration is a risk to the platform
Loss of margin and loss on unbalanced line
Distortion of analytics and false activity indicators
Multi-accounts, proxies and bots are often used
Unfair competition towards ordinary players
Abuse of bonuses, cashbacks and freebets
How the forks are revealed
Method | What is being analyzed |
---|---|
Behavioral analysis | Frequent bets on low-popularity, high-volume outcomes |
IP/device matches | Suspicious logins from different accounts, proxies, TOR |
Frequent bets on abnormal caps | Playing on sudden changes in odds |
Same Time Bid | Recurring Behavior in Account Group |
Cross-Platform Alerts | Suspicious Activity on Other Partner Projects |
Automatic restriction
The platform can apply automatic sanctions to arbitration players:
- Cap on maximum bid
- Prohibition on the use of bonuses and shares
- Deferral or manual check on withdrawal
- Freeze account until analysis is complete
- Reduction of coefficients for individual markets
- Transferring Information to Security
Tools and system logic
Scoring risk model based on betting history
Machine learning to identify new patterns
History of rejected, cancelled and "suspicious" bets
Administrator panel for manual verification
Integration with anti-fraud system, KYC and moderation
Platform Result
Preserve margin and transparent line
Protecting Honest Players and Reducing Conflict
Less support and billing
Resistance to abuse in bonus campaigns
Improving the overall economics of the project
Automatic detection and restriction of forks is a mandatory element of platform protection. This is not a fight with players, but a defense of honest betting. A system that knows how to distinguish strategy from manipulation wins in the long run.
Contact Us
Fill out the form below and we’ll get back to you soon.